Drag Racing 1/4 Mile times 0-60 Dyno Fast Cars Muscle Cars

2012 Ford Ranger T6 EuroNCAP Crash Tests (Frontal, Side, & Pole Impacts)

Five Stars Adult occupant The passenger compartment of the Ranger remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings in the tests indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and those sat in different seating positions. For the passenger, all body regions were well protected. For the driver, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end impact. Child occupant Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained in the protective shells of their restraints, minimsing the risk of dangerous head contacts. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Pedestrian The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet was more mixed, with good areas and some areas which gave poor protection to struck pedestrians. However, in the areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet provided almost entirely good protection and was predominantly good in the areas likely to be struck by an adult's head. Safety assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment on all variants of the Ranger and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the driver and front passenger seats. A speed limitation device is not available.


 



More Videos...


Chevy vs. Ford HD Truck - Bed Bend Video
Watch a video that shows the difference in bed and frame twist strength in the new Chevy and Ford HD pickup trucks.for





Crash test autobusu
Už ste niekedy videli crash testy autobusu ? Teraz máte jedinečnú príležitosť..





TOP 10 WORST CRASH TESTS
top 10 worst crash test





Toyota Camry vs Toyota Yaris - Crash test compatibilità IIHS, Sicurauto.it
http://www.sicurauto.it - Crash test compatibilità IIHS - Toyota Camry vs Toyota Yaris - 64 km/h More info: http://www.sicurauto.it/blog/news/crash-test-di-compatibilita-iihs-toyota-camry-vs-toyota-yaris-sedan.html





All New FORD RANGER Overview #3 Sustainability
Full Presentation, Test Drive and Road Trip of ALL NEW FORD RANGER by Ford Asia Pacific & Australia in Chiang Rai Thailand 10 November 2011. For more info articles and photos, please visit: http://stephenlangitan.com/





crash test
vari crash test con moto e quad





Ford Ranger Limited 3.2 TDCI 4x4 - Test - Matías Antico
Probamos a fondo la nueva Ranger 2012 en su versión full con motor de 200 CV y caja manual. Un producto de alto nivel que tiene todas las armas para liderar su segmento... si la Toyota Hilux se lo permite.





Ford Ranger im Test: Offroad ein echter Kerl
Endlich -- werden sich die deutschen Ranger-Fans denken -- ist es vorbei mit der biederen Optik des Pick-ups von Ford. Beim neuen Ranger sieht man nun die Verwandtschaft zu den größeren "F"-Modellen, die in den USA die meistverkaufte Pick-up-Baureihe darstellt. Unser Testfahrer Christian Jehle hat den neuen Konkurrenten von Amarok und Co im Offroad-Park Langenaltheim auf Herz und Nieren getestet. Den detaillierten Testbericht gibt es unter http://www.auto-news.de/test/einzeltest/anzeige_Onroad-wie-Offroad-ein-echter-Kerl-Der-neue-Ford-Ranger_id_32000





Top Gear America Best America's 4x4 Truck S01E09 - 2011.01.16





Euro NCAP | Mitsubishi L200 | 2008 | Crash test
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/mitsubishi_l200/314.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.





La Nueva Ford Ranger 2012 contra el mundo
Compilado de las pruebas realizadas de dos ingenieros de Ford Australia donde testean la Nueva Ford Ranger en diferentes exigencias y superficies. Toda la info sobre la Nueva Ranger en http://www.16valvulas.com.ar/nueva-ford-ranger-versiones-equipamiento-precios-y-colores/ Leer mas sobre el video en http://www.16valvulas.com.ar/video-nueva-ford-ranger-2012-prueba-en-todo-tipo-de-terreno/





Practical Motorhome Doubleback VW Camper review
Practical Motorhome's Jeremiah Mahadevan runs the rule over the stunning, innovative Doubleback camper, based on the venerable long-wheel base VW T5. UPDATE (13/05/2013): Danbury Motorcaravans has released a five-seater Doubleback. Watch our video review here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9DcuewWOLI For the full details, visit: http://www.practicalmotorhome.com/news/danbury-build-vw-doubleback





At www.accessories-4x4.com: New Toyota Hilux Vigo 2012 4x4 roller lid cover offroad accessories
New Toyota Hilux Vigo 2012 4x4 roller lid cover offroad accessories Link: http://www.tessera4x4.gr/en/ http://www.accessories-4x4.com http://twitter.com/Accessories4x4 http://www.facebook.com/offroad.accessories.gianso http://www.tessera4x4.com/ http://www.shop4x4.gr/ http://www.shop4x4jeep.gr/ - The top web-site with the top off-road (4x4) accessories for Jeep & Suv 4x4: Bull bars, Side steps, Roll bars, Hand rails, Loading bars, Head & tail light guards, Wind visors, Deflector, Floor mats, Trunk mats, Design sets, Skid plates, Tow bars & hitches, Rear bumpers, Toolboxes, Bed liners, Tonneau covers (full boxes), Hard tops / canopy, Dog houses for hunters, Roof rack.For the followings Jeep and pick up trucks 4x4: Chevrolet Captiva, Citroen C-crosser, Daihatsu Terios, Dodge Nitro, Dodge Caliber, Fiat Sedici, Ford Kuga, Ford Maverick, Ford Ranger, Honda CRV, Honda HRV, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Santa-fe, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Compass, Jeep Patriot, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Isuzu D-max, Kia Sportage, Kia Sorento, Land Rover Freelander, Mazda Tribute, Mazda B2500 - 2600, Mazda BT 50, Mercedes ML, Mercedes Smart, Mitsubishi Pinin, Mitsubishi L200 (Triton), Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Qashqai+2, Nissan D40 (Navara), Nissan D22 - NP 300 (Navara), Nissan X-Trail T31, Nissan X-Trail T30, Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Terrano II, Opel Antara, Peugeot 4007, SsangYong Rexton, SsangYong Actyon, SsangYong Kyron, SsangYong Actyon sport, Subaru Forester, Suzuki Sx4, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Jimny, Suzuki Vitara, Suzuki Samurai, Toyota Hilux (Vigo), Toyota Rav4, Toyota IQ, VW Tiguan.





Euro NCAP | Nissan Navara | 2008 | Crash test
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/nissan_navara/317.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.





Ford Ranger (2012) [HD]
Mit der Neuauflage des Ranger schaltet Ford auf Angriff und bietet den Pick up nun endlich auch als weltweites Modell an. In 180 Ländern kommt er auf den Markt. Basismotor in Europa wird der 2,2-Liter Duratorq, der 150 PS und 375 Newtonmeter aktiviert. Daneben wird eine leistungsreduzierten Variante mit 125 PS angeboten




Which car is faster? Which Car is Faster?





Similar 1/4 mile timeslips to browse:

2003 Ford Ranger Full Tube Chassis: 7.414 @ 183.980
Don Nase Jr, Engine: 2.3 Liter, Turbos: Single


1983 Ford Ranger short wheelbase: 9.690 @ 119.000
Robert, Engine: 408, Tires: 11.00


1984 Ford Ranger : 9.710 @ 136.000
, Engine: 331,


1987 Ford Ranger : 9.943 @ 132.520
Jay Taylor, Engine: 351 Windsor, Supercharger: Nope Turbos: Nope Tires: Mickey Thompson ET Drags


1989 Ford Ranger : 9.980 @ 135.480
Roughcut Racing Ranger, Engine: 408 Windsor (All Motor), Supercharger: Nope Turbos: Nope Tires: 31*12.5*15 MT rear / Hooiser 26/3.5 Front


1984 Ford Ranger xl: 10.572 @ 120.400
Ron Graham, Engine: 347, Tires: Hoosier


1998 Ford Ranger : 10.790 @ 124.000
Kevin Ouellette, Engine: ford 347, Supercharger: no Turbos: no Tires: Mickey thompson 29.5 x 10.5


1983 Ford Ranger : 10.873 @ 125.030
Jeff Whitaker, Engine: 347, Supercharger: weiand 174 Tires: M/T Drag Radials


1984 Ford Ranger : 11.000 @ 121.000
Richard Novak, Engine: 466 Big Block Ford, Tires: Hoosier QuickTime Pro


1984 Ford Ranger Long Bed: 11.055 @ 121.000
Mark, Engine: 501, Tires: Et Streets


1989 Ford Ranger : 11.125 @ 118.930
Darin Johnson, Engine: 351 Windsor, Tires: 31x16.5 et streets


1984 Ford Ranger : 11.380 @ 116.770
Mike Georgelin, Engine: 89 5.0L,


1992 Ford Ranger : 11.620 @ 112.000
nathan, Engine: 302, Tires: mickey street radial drags


1998 Ford Ranger : 12.065 @ 114.830
Jess Warren, Engine: 2.5 block, Supercharger: No Turbos: Holset hx35 Tires: Slicks


1993 Ford Ranger : 12.400 @ 108.000
lofgren, Engine: 302, 0 0 Tires: 11.5 x 15 slick


1995 Ford Ranger : 12.510 @ 101.650
Steven Meyer, Engine: 302 ci, Tires: Drag Radial


1986 Ford Ranger : 12.810 @ 107.000
John, Engine: dodge 360, Tires: slick


1985 Ford Ranger shortbed: 12.955 @ 110.010
Ian Olson, Engine: 289 V8, Tires: 245/45/R17 Cooper Zeon 2XS


1987 Ford Ranger Cobra: 13.170 @ 102.460
Cody, Engine: 93' Cobra 302ci, Tires: BFG Radial T/A's


1987 Ford Ranger : 14.309 @ 95.320
David MacBeth, Engine: 289, Tires: BFG's


 


©2013 DragTimes - Disclaimer